(Picture from here.)
I spoke last week on the disheartening aspects of
the issues we’re facing today. It occurred to me that I couldn’t talk about one
side of the problem without talking about the other side.
While I have problems with our cultural moment inhibiting
us, there are many, many causes for hope. We can solve the problems in front of us—many of the solutions are
either on the table or about to be. We just have to reach out and
grab them.
Here are just a few.
Energy
We get enough renewable sources of power to more
than cover our needs. Like so many things, the problem is not production. It is
distribution and storage.
We have a head start on the storage aspect by
virtue of lithium ion batteries. New sources of lithium in South America and
other places make using these batteries relatively cheap—the Tesla Power Wall
is an example. You can put more power into a “wall” than into a score of
lead-acid batteries. While lead batteries are still cheaper, lithium batteries
have a much higher density and better charge history.
But lithium ion batteries are just a stopgap. They
depend on lithium, for one. Lithium is not such a common material. Lithium ion batteries
are and will always likely be a bit on the expensive side. We need something
cheap enough it will replace the gas-fired turbine that is in reserve for when
the sun don’t shine.
To this end there are a number of interesting
alternatives being worked on.
In the periodic table, sodium lies just below
lithium. Chemical properties have a tendency to group on the columns in the
table and the sodium/lithium relationship is no exception. There has been a lot
of work on sodium-ion
batteries. This is extremely exciting. There is absolutely no shortage of sodium in the world. In
fact, one of the side products of desalination is—you guessed it—sodium. Total
tonnage of lithium mined in 2018 was 85k
metric tons. There are 35g salt in every litre of saltwater. To get the
same amount of sodium would take (if I’ve done the math correctly) 24 billion
litres—about 24 million cubic meters. Right now there is, world wide, about 86.55 million
cubic meters of water being desailnated every day. Sourcing the sodium won’t
be a problem.
But I’m even more excited by iron flow batteries. These
are batteries that depend on a fluid flow of ion exchange. It is not as energy
dense as lithium batteries but they are very
cheap and environmentally responsible. ESS
is a startup that intends to act as an energy storage system for business and—most
importantly—power plants. Remember that gas turbine on stand by I mentioned?
This is where they would be effective.
There are a lot of storage solutions being worked
on and when you read the research it looks like we are not far from real
solutions.
Which brings us to distribution.
Probably you’ve heard of the Smart Grid—having
the grid smart enough to route power more efficiently. This is one of the
things that makes having home solar power really a game changer. Right now your
solar party goes on the grid to be shipped somewhere else. Probably it
transfers to local stations and maybe from there it can be distributed. But
that doesn’t make much sense when your neighbors are right down the street. If
the grid can pull in your power why can’t it send it down your street?
The Smart Grid does more than that. It can be
locally resilient. It can allow you as a producer get the most bang for your
buck. If you have solar and local storage, why can’t you sell it back that
night when it is most needed?
A Smart Grid might also be poised to take
advantage of high
temperature superconductors. Right now, the highest temperature super
conductor is about -23 C.
But it’s under incredible pressure so it certainly isn’t ready for prime time.
At normal atmospheric pressure the high temperature is about -135C.
That doesn’t mean we’re out of the power
production research. We’re getting better and better at solar, wind and water
power. But I’m, frankly, much more excited by new nuclear power approaches.
While renewable power systems are really important
and will have to be a major part of the solution, there are incredibly power
intensive applications that may exceed them. I’m talking about iron and
aluminum production and that order of magnitudes. About half a pound of CO2 is
produced for each pound of aluminum produced.
One of the nice things about electricity is, like
money, it is fungible. The same thing can be used in many different ways. This
means the output of a heavy power production plant can be used for industry
just as well as it can be used for cooking ramen.
Here are three new areas of nuclear research that
I find interesting:
The first is thorium
reactors. Thorium is more abundant than uranium and has much less
opportunity to make nuclear weapons. It has better physical and fuel properties
and doesn’t have the same scale of nuclear waste problems.
The second is the traveling wave
ractor. I’ve heard that Bill Gates is funding this one to some degree. Imagine
a sort of pipe packed with material. On one end there is more enriched material.
It is “lit” and begins producing heat through fission. That reaction not only
heats water to run a steam turbine, it also transmutes adjacent material into a
fissionable state. Which, in turn, generates heat, etc. It’s also called a “nuclear
candle.”
There are different configurations for this that
are not a linear construction like a pipe. But that is the idea. (In September,
TerraPower and the China
National Nuclear Corporation signed a memorandum to jointly develop this
technoligy. This was abandoned in 2019 due to restrictions placed on it by the
Trump administration.)
Finally, there is the old standby, fusion
power.
This is a hard
problem. It’s why people have been saying that no matter when you ask about it,
it’s always fifty years in the future.
That said, there have been some very interesting
developments that suggest it may actually become doable in the near future. I
would not wager a lot of money on it
but I would wager some. Certainly, it’s the correct long term solution. The
above two technologies, coupled with reneables, would give us the breathing
room we need to finish development of fusion. There are some significant major
energy requirements in our future and we will need a much larger source of
power than we have now. We’re need power for those lasers to send off probes to
Alpha Centauri.
Medicine
We are on the cusp of really starting to attack
the problems of aging. I’m just going to talk about a few:
A while back there was a length of life study of
diabetics. Diabetics generally have a significantly reduced lifespan even when
the problem is controlled. They found one population of type 2 diabetics that
had an average lifespan that exceeded the control group. When they investigated
this they discovered this group was taking metformin. Metformin is a
cheap, well tolerated drug.
Subsequent studies have suggested that it has a
beneficial effect on many age related conditions. There is now longevity study for
it.
You can always tell when something works: Big
Pharma circles around it like sharks after a wounded seal.
Recently, a fish
oil derivative has been approved by the FDA as a heart disease.
My own favorite is some research in intracellular
antiviral responses. This mechanism is a relatively weak response when
compared to the normal immune response. Essentially, if a cell detects it’s
been infected it kills itself. The idea is that initially there aren’t very
many cells that get infected by the virus so we can afford to lose them. In
addition, the infected cell is compromised anyway so it’s a small loss.
Most pathogenic viruses have figured this one out.
Which is why they are pathogens.
There’s been some work in attaching virus
identification molecules to triggers in the system, enhancing the response.
Thus, a mouse cell would be infected and in the normal course of events burst
with new viruses and the organism dies. The engineered protien identifies the
virus and triggers the cell death.
Environment
Conservation systems are also becoming mainstream—we
have all seen how LED lighting can now be competitive with other forms so
powering a home takes less energy. We need it. CO2 is going to make our lives
miserable.
It’s all well and good if we stop putting CO2 into
the air. What do we do with the CO2 that’s already there?
Recent research has suggested that reforestation
might well get a huge bang for the buck by something as simple as reforestation. Remember
the global warming problem is two fold: 1) We are putting out an enormous
amount of fossil carbon into the atmosphere and 2) We’re removing many
mechanisms by which that carbon is pulled out of the atmosphere.
Apparently, this has a much bigger
impact than was previously considered. It’s cheap and it’s scalable.
Consider it geoengineering that we can live with. Or would you like to put up
enough hydrogen sulfide to block the sun?
Plastic is another problem. There are two big
problems here: 1) plastics that have already degraded into micro plastics and
2) that fact we’re still producing it.
It’s probable we’re not going to get rid of
plastics—it has become just too useful. That leaves two other alternatives:
better recycling and biodegredation.
We’ve been hearing a lot about the loss of
recycling capability in recent years. Let’s be clear. Most plastics can be recycled. It’s not a matter of technology. It’s
a matter of labor and energy.
There are a number of communities springing up
that demonstrate. The one I like is Precious Plastics. They have
developed methods and techniques to take things considered “unrecyclable” and,
well, recycle them into building products, textiles and jewelry.
Microplastics are created by us and dumped into
waterways and the sea and they are also created by plastics that are ground up
by ocean action.
Capturing microplastics before they reach the
ocean is an area of ongoing research. Here are a couple of interesting technologies
that may be fruitful.
This one is strange: the cora ball. It claims to capture 26% if
microfibers before they ever get out of the washing machine. I don’t think any
consumer item is going to be that effective. But I could see technology like
this introduced into washing machines. This
article attacks the problem in a larger scale manner.
There are research efforts in trying to clear the
microplastics out of the ocean. Alfa
Laval has some pilot projects on doing this.
But we still have to clear the material that is
already there. That is a huge problem for which I haven’t seen a solution. Any
process that filters out microplastics also filters out plankton and we’d have
to put that back uninjured.
Recycling microplastics has a different scale of
problem than full sized products. Full sized products can be sorted. Different
materials have different recycling techniques. That said, I don’t think this is
insurmountable.
Community
I’ve saved the best for last.
One thing the internet has given us is the ability
to form communities. Many artistic, technological and scientific endeavors have
been enabled by using indie-go-go and kickstarter. The above Precious Plastic
is a world wide community.
It’s convenient to rail against the bad
communities. The same medium that gave us Precious Plastic also gives us neo-nazies.
That said, we are—as a community of human beings—are
at the cusp of amazing things. Human beings have always been a mix of
cooperative and antagonistic individuals. We invented religion and government
to keep ourselves in harness to one another, to pick cooperation over conflict.
That we enabled conflicts between religions and governments should come as no
surprise. Gaming the system is always one of our options.
But the tribalisms, conflicts and grudges that got
us here will not get us much further. We cannot
solve these problems without working together.
All that holds us back is us.