I saw Superman last week.
(Picture from here.)
It’s a pretty good film—probably the best Superman film
since Christopher Reeve’s
first attempt.
There are those that have said it even bests that since it doesn’t attempt the
birth/Krypton origin story. It’s based, in part, on All-Star Superman
and more than a little resembles HBO’s My Adventures
with Superman.
Spoilers after this.
But—it still has all the Superman beats: Superman is
a good guy. He’s just trying to do good deeds. Perry White still runs the Daily
Planet. Jimmy Olson is still a junior reporter. Supes loves Lois Lane. Ma and
Pa Kent are still the loving parents from Kansas. Print journalism that works.
I have some issues with Ma Kent’s accent which sounds more like Deep Ozarks
than Kansas to me but that’s a quibble.
In other words, the mythology is retained and some—but not
too many—new wrinkles added.
On the surface, this shouldn’t be too unexpected. It has a
long tradition back to Parzival
and Tristan and
Isolde, where the poets take existing material and redisplay it from a
new point of view. God knows how many Arthur and the Round Table stories there
have been. But, this is a problem over time and especially in our money
driven culture. These stories accumulate over time. How many Romeo and Juliets
have there been? How many Hamlets? Superman, himself, has undergone many
reboots. As have other Marvel and DC comic characters. Each time, the beats
remain the same.
Sometimes, they mythology is broken. A good example
of this is Red Son,
which tells the story of a Superman whose rocket had not grounded in Kansas but
12 hours later in a Ukrainian collective under Stalin. That broke the
mold. It had many of the same character: Lex, Jimmy, Lois, etc. But there was
no Ma and Pa Kent. No Clark Kent. The Daily Planet of Jimmy and Perry is in the
US while Superman is half a world away. Lois is married to Lex and never
really meets Superman at all.
Red Son was a critical and commercial success but it
was a what if? sort of story. An alternate history of an alternate
history. Reboots of Superman inevitably seem to return to norm: Superman and
Lois, Clark, Jimmy, Perry. Superman loses his powers but regains them. Gets
different powers and return to the same set. (As an aside, super breath?
That freezes? Come on!) Sometimes he starts as a super baby.
Others, he gets his powers as a child, a middle schooler, a teen. But he always
ends up the strongest guy on the beach. Let’s be clear, too. It’s not artistic
forces that cause this. The forces are financial. Superman makes money. He
makes money fulfilling the mythology, not breaking it.
One of the interesting things about the Marvel Cinematic
Universe (MCU) is that it broke a bit of the mythology in the very
beginning. This began in Iron Man,
when Robert Downey
Jr. said “I am Iron Man” as an ad lib that so captured the producers they
said, let’s go with that. I do like the MCU better than I have (up to now) the
DCU in the sense that Marvel made an attempt to have the heroics be an
outgrowth of the character of the heroes rather than the characters subsumed
into the heroics. DCU went the other way. Also, the MCU is often funny. The DCU
(again, up to now.) was not.
That said, in both the DCU and MCU, the mythology drives the
story. There are always twelve labors of Hercules, Leda is always raped
by Zeus in the form of a swan, Medusa
is always slain by Perseus.
Except when there isn’t.
The YouTube channel of Jun Chiu has an interesting
take on Medusa. There is Medusa, the Prequel and Medusa, the Stone Kingdom.
Essentially, it’s told in a series of beautiful paintings of a quasi-cartoon
style along with music. There is no dialog of any sort but that doesn’t make
any difference in the telling. The Prequel has a take on the Perseus
story. The Stone Kingdom comes later. These are quite compelling pieces
that break the mythology and in the breaking find something quite new.
Parzival didn’t break the mythology. Parzival still
fails at his quest and then returns and succeeds. But Wolfram von
Eschenbach had a bone to pick with society and embedded his response to
chivalry in it. The story of Parzival hits the beats but Gawain is included also as an
interesting counterpoint. Von Eschenbach didn’t break the mythology but he bent
it pretty strongly.
My point is that the best material dealing with these
mythologies are those that tackle the mythology itself rather than just a
retelling. Some break it (Red Son) and some bend it (Parzival.)
The degree of reshaping can create something new. It may, of course, just be tin
foil rather than gold. I recently saw a discussion of a new Batman where he is
the son of Aztec royalty bent on freeing his people from Spanish rule. And it
was advertising all the beats: the Joker, Catwoman, Two-Face. Since it hasn’t
been released, I have no real idea on the nature of the take. But the fact that
they are advertising the beats doesn’t bode well.
Which brings us to the problem of franchise mythologies
these days: they are businesses. They can be the product of a singular talent
but that talent is in the service of corporations. Artistic endeavors that do
not turn the expected profit are rarely continued merely because they are
artistically successful. Remember Firefly?
Mythologies are stories burned down to essence in refining
fire. They are the bones of stories. Putting flesh on those bones makes for
actual tales. What we see in these franchise mythologies are stories that are
built to emphasize those bones, those highlights, those Cliff notes, with
pretty lights, quick banter, and big explosions. The first of the franchise
might be good—Reeve’s Superman. But there is money to be made so Superman
II, III, and IV were made, each progressively less interesting, with
prettier lights, and more stupidity.
This is a problem with the whole franchise mythology. They
get progressively worse as sequels pile onto sequels or novels pile onto novels.
I think it’s in part because the mythological bones aren’t enough to sustain
the franchise on their own. And a lot of the time, those left to continue the
project aren’t talented or creative enough to keep it alive.
Sometimes an individual or team’s spirit is enough to keep
the franchise going for a while. The MCU was pretty good at keeping it together
from Iron Man (2008) to Avengers: Endgame
(2019.) Eleven years and twenty-two films. There were a fair number of duds in
that list—you can pick your own—but the arc was sound. They have had trouble
since. They had a rich mythology within the Marvel comic universe to pull from
but that mythology, itself, grew thin over time. Both Marvel and DC tend to get
bound up in their own canon to the point that they have to break their
structure to keep the cash cow flowing.
The Star
Wars franchise has a worse problem. Marvel and DC both have experience
in tearing down a structure and rebuilding it in a “new” way—it ultimately
returns to the original mythology but at least the journey back can be fun. Star
Wars has no such mechanism. It just churns on, feeding on itself, until understanding
the projects requires deep understanding of its minutia. Game of Thrones, I
think, suffered similarly.
Ultimately, franchise mythologies suffer from a basic
defect: they have no ending. Parzival had an ending. Star Wars
does not. The MCU does not. As long as there is money to be made, that horse is
going to be flogged, dead or not.
News today: The current USDA is requesting
names, birthdates, and social security numbers for those receiving SNAP
benefits. What could go wrong? RFK Jr is likely to destroy the US
Preventive Services panel just like he destroyed the vaccine panel. And the
president is claiming
Beyoncé
broke the law for doing something that didn’t happen.