Consideration of Works "Past": Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind

Usually I talk about works I read when I was younger now rediscovered. But in this case, I'm going to talk about something that I've read relatively recently—not the film version of Nausicaä. The manga. It’s a works past, of a sort. I mean, it’s new to me but it’s been out for forty years.

 

So sue me.

(Picture from here.)

Hayao Miyazaki is primarily a film director and animator and it's by his film work that he is best known. If you haven't seen a Miyazaki film, stop reading this blog right now and go rent one. Kiki's Delivery Service is a good one. Or Castle in the Sky. I have a weak spot for Porco Russo, since it's about seaplane pilots. Or you could go straight to the big guns and get Princess Mononoke or Spirited Away. Or, of course, you could also watch Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind.

Oh, hell. They're all terrific. Go watch them.

The manga is in seven volumes. If you've seen Nausicaä the film, you'd be forgiven for thinking that the first couple of volumes are pretty much a recap of the film. There is more than one story about why Miyazaki did the manga. Miyazaki couldn't initially get funding for the film and so put out the mangas. Miyazaki couldn't get funding for a film that didn't have an associated manga. Etc. The mangas were written from 1982 to 1994. The film was made in 1984.

A thousand years before the story starts there was a terrible war fought, in part, by God Warriors: giant mechanisms with horrific weapons. Vast areas of the world are now filled with poisonous forests inhabited by giant insects. The forests appear to be fungal in nature and spread by spores, often carried by insects or unwary travelers. However, the poison is everywhere and people eventually die of it.

Nausicaä is a princess of the Valley of the Wind—the royalty component of the story seems to not have a direct connection to rule. Her father did rule the valley but there are hints toward the end that there may be other paths to being a sovereign than heredity. Regardless, she is looked up to and admired by the folk of the valley.

War breaks out and there are treaty obligations that the Valley send troops. Nausicaä goes with them. The war was between the Torumekeans and the Doroks. As she proceeds through the different convolutions of the war, encountering spiritual struggle, biological warfare, and enormous cruelty, she becomes more and more important. She is a force for good in an amoral conflict. Eventually, her influence, the power of the insects and the suffocating horror of the war all come together and she prevails.

I'm not going to get more detailed than that. The plot is intricate and clever but I think it is actually a side note to the issues Miyazaki is handling.

Miyazaki has always had environmental concerns. Pretty much every movie has some sort of component that can be construed to be environmental. Even Porco Russo, a story about a seaplane pilot who's become a pig, has a continuing discussion of the balance between selfishness and selflessness—which, I think, reflects Miyazaki's concerns with the environment.

In Nausicaä these issues are front and center. Humans have to live on a poisoned planet—poison that is of their own making. The poison is killing them. Yet they still war. Religion is a political means to an end. The personal and selfish pursuit of power is the source of the world's evil.

But it's not a screed. It's a story where these bits come out as important plot details. There’s no preaching here. Nausicaä never says "If only humans would somehow cease the immorality of their ways and learn to help one another. Ah, Atlantis." She does lament human behavior more than once but it's more in the vein of "Come on, guys. Stop hitting yourselves."

The film handles some of this but much of the rich and detailed tapestry of Myazaki's world is given only token treatment. The God Warrior is just a prop. The sword master Yupa a part of the chorus. This is the cost of compressing Miyazaki’s vision into a two hour film. The manga is much more detailed.

One of the interesting things in Nausicaä's character is her continuing avoidance of killing—not because she's a pacifist. But because she discovers early on the killing rage in her own heart and how easily it can be released. She decides that this is something she must control and from then on she keeps trying to find different ways to make things better. Ways that do not require homicide. Not easy in the middle of a war.

This continuing attempt to not kill anybody and to stop people from killing one another, coupled with her own forceful personality, begins to have knock on effects. People start to take her seriously and, in doing so, take her point of view seriously.

Nausicaä is, no doubt, some sort of Christ figure in this. But it's a Christ figure that we're not used to. Nausicaä is not passive. She's not going to volunteer for the cross. If she goes down she's going down trying to save everyone around her whether they want it or not.

I've read this series twice now and this aspect of Nausicaä's character is what stays with me. She's like the members of Doctors without Borders, going out there and working until they drop to save people's lives.

The work has its limitations. There is little introspection regarding motive—people just do, knowing what they must do instinctively. In my experience there's just a little consideration of what must be done. The ending is a bit abrupt. It feels wrongly shaped—I think everything happens that has to happen but it seems clunky in execution. Miyazaki did all of the drawing in pencil and the artwork is wonderful, but it’s a little opaque at times. Sometimes, you want to just see the precise definition of ink in some of the action sequences and instead there’s a blur of motion.

But these are quibbles. It's a terrific read rendered by a master storyteller at the height of his powers.

 

 

State of the farm, June 2026

Well, the new garden is planted. The map is shown here.

 

It’s still early days so we haven’t had a lot of seedlings. Radishes, certainly. And the sets we put out are firming up nicely. 

 

It’s worth discussing a few entries.

 

We’re putting in corn this year. We haven’t planted corn for some time. We like Bloody Butcher as a variety of hard corn. It has a meaty flavor when we make corn breads or other corn based meals. It also grows to eight feet tall with big ears. Bloody Butcher is more of a statement than many other varieties.

 

We’re also trying the three sisters method as we saw it practiced by a few Native Americans on some videos we saw. In the past, we grew in rows. This year we’re trying small groupings interspersed with squash. We will likely add in some beans but we haven’t decided what. We have four squash planted: a pumpkin, spaghetti, a butternut, and a cushaw. 

 

We tried cushaw squash and very much liked it. We only got a single fruit but it was huge. It tastes well and gave good seeds so we saved them and planted them this year.

 

We went all in on carrots this year: Atomic Red, Danvers, Yellowstone, and Dragon. I like red carrots. We’re also going to try a very large carrot from Japan known as Manpukuji. These carrots grow as long as five feet. We planted them in the very deepest part of the new garden. We don’t expect five feet—the soil just isn’t that deep. But it might be a fun experiment. It’s a 120 day carrot so we don’t have high expectations. 

 

We also have another couple of code tolerant carrot varieties that we’ll be planting later in the summer to harvest in the fall.

 

We’re going to try sugar beets again this year. I put them in a fairly deep area of the garden with the hope they’ll grow better. I’m still figuring out how get at the sugar in the sugar beets in a home garden sort of way. We’ll see how that goes.

 

We went in hard on radishes, too. We planted four varieties: French Breakfast, Sora OG, Cherry Belle, and Round Black. I like radishes. Sue me.

 

The final experiment we’re trying in the main garden this year is gungo or pigeon peas. 

 

These are a perennial pea in many of the areas where it’s grown. That, unfortunately, is not an option for us. We could possibly grow it year round in the green house but there is always a winter pollination problem. Regardless, we’re trying it in the main garden first.

 

These peas are small—say, half the size of a regular pea. They don’t like overwatering or cold—again, this is a “we’ll see” sort of planting. Usually, with peas or beans, one soaks them first and then plants them. I’m not really sure that’s the right thing to do here but we did it anyway. It’s supposedly a quite prolific.

 

Pigeon peas and regular peas are both members of family Fabaceae, but different genuses. Pigeon peas are genus Cajanus and regular peas are genus Lathyrus. Pigeon peas are a perennial—often grown as a short lived shrub. I did read it can be grown as an annual but I’m not sure if that’s really viable. If we get germination, we may end up putting it in a pot—something I also understand is definitely viable. We could pollinate by hand. If it was good enough for Mendel, it’s likely good enough for us.

 

I’m happy with the garden so far. Here’s a good little picture of the current situation. Notice the corn in the background and the wee radishes growing under the hoop houses. 

 

This is a good thing.

 

It’s been our intent to grow as much of our own food as possible. The original idea is that this way we know the content of our food as well as what varieties. There are environmental ideas as well—food we grow and preserve don’t make CO2 the same way as buying produce and other things. That said, we still go to the grocery store so maybe it’s just a wash. 

 

But we’ve been seeing a lot of stories on food insecurity lately. It’s not only because of Orange Voldemort’s war (See here and here.) and his policies (See here, here, and here) but those on the margins are being forced into hardship just by the rise in costs.

 

There have been some ongoing food issues we’ve been concerned about for some time. Rising drought problems in areas that depend on fossil aquifers is one. The way industrial farm practices seem to innately ruin the soil where they used—causing an increase in those same destructive farm practices. But it has seemed that those issues were far enough ahead of us we might be able to prepare for them.

 

We didn’t expect to have a president that would destroy those mechanisms of government that might execute that preparation or create a world economic situation that would bring those issues home immediately. We were thinking we would suffer benign neglect rather than malicious malfeasance. 

 

But, at least, more people are gardening.